The Proposal at a Glance

Freeze–Vote–Rebuild (FVR) is a sequenced, verification-first framework designed to move from active war to a legitimate political outcome and large-scale reconstruction.

It separates three problems that are often entangled: stopping the violence, establishing legitimacy, and rebuilding the country.

---

Table of Contents

Deep Dives

• Theory of Change How verification and sequencing create a path to peace without requiring trust.
• Phased Timeline The sequence of deliverables, entry gates, and exit gates for each phase.
• Core Principles & Red Lines The operational rules (e.g., "Verification-First") and non-negotiable failure triggers.

Context & Scope

• What This Is Not Clarifying that this is a framework for a process, not a final negotiated treaty.
• Deltas Between Versions How this operational framework evolved from previous drafts and essays.

---

Executive Summary

The intent is to create a process that is auditable, conditional, and reversible if compliance breaks—rather than a one-shot bargain that depends on promises.

1. Freeze

Objective: Stop major combat operations under a monitored arrangement.

• Ceasefire Terms: Defined geography, prohibited activities, and enforcement triggers.
• Verification: Independent monitoring and incident reporting.
• Protection: Deconfliction mechanisms and humanitarian corridors for civilians.

2. Vote

Objective: Run a supervised legitimacy process to determine political outcomes.

• Electorate: Clear definition including residents plus displaced persons/refugees.
• Integrity: Supervised voting architecture (auditing, anti-coercion measures).
• Mapping: Optional use of a published, version-locked “vote-to-border” method if outcomes translate into lines.

3. Rebuild

Objective: Unlock reconstruction at scale.

• Governance: Transparent procurement standards designed to resist capture.
• Incentives: A competitive, metrics-driven delivery model (“Reconstruction Olympics”) to speed up rebuilding.
• Transparency: Public reporting on projects, costs, and timelines.

Verification-First: The Operating Logic

The proposal is built around gates:

• Each phase has entry/exit criteria measured by observable indicators.
• Benefits (sanctions relief, aid tranches) are tied to verified compliance.
• Violations trigger predefined responses (investigation, escalation ladder, rollback).

Status-Neutral Design

The framework avoids requiring agreement on final status before violence stops. Instead, it uses a supervised legitimacy process to determine outcomes. “Status-neutral” does not mean “values-neutral”; it means the mechanism itself does not predetermine the result.