King Klown Logo
King Klown& KOA

Verification-First Gates

Verification-first gates are the control mechanism of Freeze–Vote–Rebuild. They define measurable criteria that must be met to:

This chapter provides a template for gate design.

Design Principles for Gates

A good gate is:

Avoid gates based on intent, rhetoric, or vague “good faith” language.

Gate Taxonomy

Phase Gates (Macro)

Determine progression:

Benefit Gates (Micro)

Determine incremental unlocks within phases:


Template: Define Each Gate in a Standard Format

For each gate, specify:

  1. Name and Purpose
  2. Indicators (what is measured)
  3. Thresholds (numeric or categorical)
  4. Measurement Window (e.g., rolling 14 days)
  5. Data Sources (monitors, sensors, audits, observers)
  6. Decision Authority (who certifies)
  7. Consequences (advance/pause/rollback; what exactly changes)
  8. Appeal/Dispute Process (how contested determinations are handled)
  9. Publication Policy (what is reported publicly)

Example Gates (Illustrative)

Gate A: Freeze Stability Gate

Purpose: Verify the ceasefire is holding well enough to begin Vote preparation.

Indicators:

Thresholds:

Consequences:


Gate B: Vote Readiness Gate

Purpose: Confirm the Vote can occur safely and credibly.

Indicators:

Consequences:


Gate C: Vote Integrity Gate (Certification Gate)

Purpose: Determine whether results can be certified.

Indicators:

Consequences:


Gate D: Reconstruction Integrity Gate (Tranche Gate)

Purpose: Release reconstruction funds only when governance and delivery remain clean.

Indicators:

Consequences:


Gaming Resistance: Multi-Indicator Design

To reduce gaming:

Governance Integration

Gates rely on governance bodies to:

See:

Drafting Note

When the book is populated with full content, this page should include a single table listing all gates, indicators, thresholds, windows, and consequences. This should map directly to the Sanctions/Aid Linkage and the Metrics & KPIs Toolkit.